Responding to Home School Pro vs. Con

The video 15.1 is very useful, and I have learned how they effectively organize their persuasive speech outline. They both have clearly established their claims, and have sufficiently cited credible evidences to support their conclusions. On the pro side of the speaker uses the emotional appeal by telling an example of child abuse in public schools to get her audience attention. She then provides many effective evidences which cite from variously credible experts assertions and statistics to support her claim. On the other hand, the con 's speaker presents a logical appeal by how and what do we do to educate our children. And this appeal has effectively influenced the audiences siding with him. Moreover, he uses the deductive reasoning to firmly organize his supporting evidences by questioning about the credibility of parent status as a teacher, and their roles to their children. In addition, he uses a fact to support his claim, a useful survey which is from the home school parents, who want their children at least to take part time in a public or private school. With this in mind, instead of asserting how many advantages in your claim, the opponent side’s drawback is the most effective support to support your claim.